Solved thermodynamics exercise
A model fundamental relation: equations of state, Euler and Gibbs–Duhem
Exercise 37 · Lesson 7 — Mathematical Structure: The Fundamental Relations
- fundamental relation
- entropy representation
- energy representation
- equations of state
- extensivity
- Euler relation
- Gibbs-Duhem relation
- chemical potential
Statement
Consider a simple system with a variable number of particles , whose fundamental relation in the entropy representation is
where is a constant and , and . This academic model does not describe a real substance; it allows us to check the general properties established in the lesson on a fully calculable example. Recall the differential fundamental relation
- Show that this relation is extensive, that is, that is a homogeneous function of degree one of . Check that is an increasing function of and deduce the sign of the temperature.
- In the entropy representation, calculate the three equations of state , and in terms of , and .
- Invert the fundamental relation to obtain . Then calculate , and in the energy representation, in terms of , and , and check that the results of Question 2 are recovered.
- Check the Euler relation , then its form in the entropy representation, .
- Let and . Express , and in terms of and , then show that . Eliminate and to obtain as a function of and only.
- Use this result to check the Gibbs–Duhem relation . What does it mean for the intensive variables , and ?
Hint
Detailed solution
is therefore homogeneous of degree one: the relation is extensive. At fixed and , is proportional to , a strictly increasing function of . Its derivative is therefore positive, hence . The chemical potential of this model is therefore negative. The partial derivatives give Let us check agreement with Question 2 for the temperature. With , we have , so which is indeed the reciprocal of . For the pressure, multiply by : Similarly, The two representations do indeed give the same equations of state. Thus which is the Euler relation. In the entropy representation, Now , so : the Euler relation holds in both representations. This is no coincidence: it follows from Euler's theorem, since is homogeneous of degree one. The intensive quantities depend only on the per-particle quantities and , as extensivity requires. Comparing and , Now eliminate and . The expression for gives . Substituting into : Then Finally, Question 6. Dividing the Gibbs–Duhem relation by , it reads . It therefore requires Differentiate . At fixed , At fixed , since the derivative of is , Both equalities hold. The Gibbs–Duhem relation means that the three intensive variables , and are not independent: in a homogeneous single-species phase, is entirely determined by and . There are only two intensive degrees of freedom.